By: Armando Prato | Comments (5) | Related: > Constraints
Problem
Some time ago, I loaded a large set of data into one my tables. To speed up the load, I disabled the FOREIGN KEY and CHECK constraints on the table and then re-enabled them after the load was complete. I am now finding that some of the loaded data was referentially invalid. What happened?
Solution
Disabling constraint checking for FOREIGN KEYS and CHECK constraints is accomplished using the ALTER TABLE statement and specifying a NOCHECK on the constraint. However, when re-enabling constraints, I've seen many instances where the DBA would re-enable the constraints by specifying CHECK but forget (or not know) to ask the SQL Server engine to re-verify the relationships by additionally specifying WITH CHECK. By specifying CHECK but not additionally specifying WITH CHECK, the SQL Server engine will enable the constraint but not verify that referential integrity is intact. Furthermore, when a FOREIGN KEY or CHECK constraint is disabled, SQL Server will internally flag the constraint as not being "trustworthy". This can cause the optimizer to not consider the constraint relationship when trying to generate the most optimal query plans.
In a Management Studio connection, run the following script to create a parent table called EMPLOYEE and a child table called TIMECARD. TIMECARD rows may only exist provided that the EMPLOYEE row exists
SET NOCOUNT ON GO CREATE TABLE DBO.EMPLOYEE ( EMPLOYEEID INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, FIRSTNAME VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, LASTNAME VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL ) GO CREATE TABLE DBO.TIMECARD ( TIMECARDID INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, EMPLOYEEID INT NOT NULL, HOURSWORKED TINYINT NOT NULL, DATEWORKED DATETIME NOT NULL ) GO -- Only allow valid employees to have a timecard ALTER TABLE DBO.TIMECARD ADD CONSTRAINT FK_TIMECARD_EMPLOYEEID FOREIGN KEY (EMPLOYEEID) REFERENCES DBO.EMPLOYEE(EMPLOYEEID) ON DELETE CASCADE GO INSERT INTO DBO.EMPLOYEE (FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME) SELECT 'JOHN', 'DOE' GO INSERT INTO DBO.TIMECARD (EMPLOYEEID, HOURSWORKED, DATEWORKED) SELECT 1, 8, '2008-01-01' GO |
Now run the following query (valid for both SQL Server 2000 and 2005) to check the foreign key constraint's trustworthiness
| SELECT CASE WHEN OBJECTPROPERTY(OBJECT_ID('FK_TIMECARD_EMPLOYEEID'), 'CnstIsNotTrusted') = 1 THEN 'NO' ELSE 'YES' END AS 'IsTrustWorthy?' GO |
You will see that the SQL Server engine considers the foreign key constraint as referentially valid
Now we'll load some additional data but we'll disable the constraint prior to load. Once the rows are loaded, we'll re-enable the constraint. Typically, a DBA would do this when loading large amounts of data in order to speed up the load. For illustrative purposes, we'll just load 3 new rows.
ALTER TABLE DBO.TIMECARD NOCHECK CONSTRAINT FK_TIMECARD_EMPLOYEEID GO INSERT INTO DBO.TIMECARD (EMPLOYEEID, HOURSWORKED, DATEWORKED) SELECT 1, 8, '2008-01-02' GO INSERT INTO DBO.TIMECARD (EMPLOYEEID, HOURSWORKED, DATEWORKED) SELECT 1, 8, '2008-01-03' GO INSERT INTO DBO.TIMECARD (EMPLOYEEID, HOURSWORKED, DATEWORKED) SELECT 2, 8, '2008-01-04' GO ALTER TABLE DBO.TIMECARD CHECK CONSTRAINT FK_TIMECARD_EMPLOYEEID GO |
If we now re-examine the constraint's trustworthiness and you will see that the SQL Server engine now does not believe the constraint is trustworthy enough to use in execution plan generation.
Wait a minute! If you didn't notice, I have an error in my script! The 3rd row I added is for EMPLOYEEID = 2. However, this EMPLOYEEID does not exist in my table! This is because the CHECK issued when the constraint was re-enabled strictly controls re-enabling the constraint; it does not verify that referential integrity is intact. Running DBCC CHECKCONSTRAINTS(TIMECARD) verifies that referential integrity has been violated:
This is why it's imperative that you re-enable your constraints by additionally specifying the little known WITH CHECK option. Without specifying WITH CHECK, the SQL Server engine will enable your constraints without checking referential integrity (and as we see, will consider the constraints untrustworthy for query optimization). In the example, if we re-enabled the constraint using the following statement, we would've seen up front that there was an integrity issue with the loaded data.
ALTER TABLE DBO.TIMECARD WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT FK_TIMECARD_EMPLOYEEID GO |
If we fix the erroneous row and then re-enable the constraint correctly, we see that that no referential integrity violation is detected and the constraint can now be trusted by the SQL Server optimizer.
UPDATE DBO.TIMECARD SET EMPLOYEEID = 1 WHERE EMPLOYEEID = 2 GO ALTER TABLE DBO.TIMECARD WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT FK_TIMECARD_EMPLOYEEID GO SELECT CASE WHEN OBJECTPROPERTY(OBJECT_ID('FK_TIMECARD_EMPLOYEEID'), 'CnstIsNotTrusted') = 1 THEN 'NO' ELSE 'YES' END AS 'IsTrustWorthy?' GO |
If you're worried about having untrusted constraints in your database, you can check using the following query (this can be run on both SQL Server 2000 and 2005 databases)
| select table_name, constraint_name from information_schema.table_constraints where (constraint_type = 'FOREIGN KEY' or constraint_type = 'CHECK') and objectproperty(object_id(constraint_name), 'CnstIsNotTrusted') = 1 go |
Next Steps
- Read more about OBJECTPROPERTY in the SQL Server 2005 Books Online
- Read more about DBCC CHECKCONSTRAINTS in the SQL Server 2005 Books Online
- Read more about INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS view in the SQL Server 2005 Books Online
About the author
Armando Prato has close to 30 years of industry experience and has been working with SQL Server since version 6.5.This author pledges the content of this article is based on professional experience and not AI generated.
View all my tips
