![]() |
|
|
By: Armando Prato | Read Comments (6) | Print Armando has over 24 years of industry experience and has been working with SQL Server since version 6.5. Related Tips: More |
|
Problem
Microsoft provides a good set of basic queries into their system tables. However, some of these procedures lack some additional information that I'm interested in and I find myself constantly issuing queries to get this additional data. Is there a way I can run these queries like system procedures?
Solution
By creating a stored procedure in the SQL Server master database prefixed with sp_, you can take advantage of the engine's stored procedure name resolution algorithm. If a stored procedure begins with sp_, the engine will search the master database first before checking the current database and ownership. As an aside, this name resolution is precisely why you should never prefix your application database stored procedures with sp_ as you will continually incur the overhead associated with an unnecessary search and a cache miss every time you attempt to execute these procedures.
When running an sp_ prefixed procedure from master, there are some subtleties as to which database context is used, which impacts what data is returned.
Consider the following example:
USE MASTER |
Examining the output, we can see that the DB_NAME() function ran under the context of the AdventureWorks database as did the SQL Server 2000 statement to retrieve the Employee table metadata from sysobjects. However, the equivalent INFORMATION_SCHEMA and SQL Server 2005 statements did not work and the SELECT from the Employee table failed outright. These did not work because the statements actually ran under the context of the master database. While the procedure was found in master, it wasn't smart enough to use the current database context for the SQL Server 2005 specific catalog information.
Well, the SQL Server 2000 system tables will be eventually phased out so how do we get around this? Well, there's an undocumented system stored procedure named sp_ms_marksystemobject that can be used to flag the engine that the stored procedure should be run as though it were a Microsoft provided system stored procedure. Like any other of the undocumented commands, it could disappear in a future release and should be used at your own risk.
USE MASTER |
Marking our procedure with sp_ms_marksystemobject shows that it has been registered with the engine as it were a Microsoft supplied procedure.
Re-running the procedure now shows that all statements are run under context of the AdventureWorks database
USE AdventureWorks |
As you can see, this is a really effective way to centralize some of your frequently run queries so they're available for use against multiple databases hosted on your server. It should be noted that adding objects to the master database is not generally considered a good practice, so I don't make use of this feature on production servers. However, I do maintain several QA and Load Test servers and I make use of it in these cases.
Next Steps
| Share: | Share | Tweet |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Free SQL Server Learning |
| Friday, October 24, 2008 - 7:19:23 AM - jerryhung | Read The Tip |
|
I also believe if you create any SP in master DB, it can be called from any DB I generally avoid naming anything sp_XXX just so I know it's not a MSFT SP. If you create a usp_XXX in master, it should be callable in any user DB as well and no confusion there |
|
| Friday, October 24, 2008 - 7:48:33 AM - aprato | Read The Tip |
|
Hi Jerry I'm not sure this would work. I think it has to be prefixed with an sp_ to work. I'll try it out on my test box and verify but I seem to recall that marking a proc that's not prefixed with sp_ didn't work because the name resolution does not kick in. |
|
| Friday, October 24, 2008 - 8:39:28 AM - aprato | Read The Tip |
|
I just verified that you need to prefix with sp_ for this to work. The name resolution does not kick in even if you mark a non sp_ prefixed proc. |
|
| Friday, October 24, 2008 - 9:10:16 AM - jerryhung | Read The Tip |
|
Yep, I just tried that too, sucks exec master.dbo.Jerry -- this worksUSE MASTER EXECUTE sp_ms_marksystemobject 'Jerry'exec Jerry -- now this works after above statement But it is interesting to read about this anyway, thanks
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning/sp_performance/850/ |
|
| Friday, October 24, 2008 - 10:46:44 AM - aprato | Read The Tip |
|
I tried your example on 2 separate SQL 2005 machines (Build 3042 and 3054) and neither resolved the name. What build and version are you running? |
|
| Friday, October 24, 2008 - 10:53:46 AM - jerryhung | Read The Tip |
|
Never mind, I probably was in the 'master' db. sorry for the confusion USE masterGO create procedure Jerry AS select GETDATE()GO USE AdventureWorks2008exec Jerry -- cannot find SPexec master.dbo.Jerry -- only this worksUSE MASTEREXECUTE sp_ms_marksystemobject 'Jerry'USE AdventureWorks2008exec Jerry -- cannot find SP |
|
|
privacy | disclaimer | copyright | advertise | about authors | contribute | feedback | giveaways | user groups Some names and products listed are the registered trademarks of their respective owners. Edgewood Solutions LLC | MSSharePointTips.com | MSSQLTips.com |