![]() |
|

Low-impact SQL Server auditing of all user activity and data changes
|
|
By: Jugal Shah | Read Comments (12) | Related Tips: More > Database Administration |
In some cases there may be a need to make a SQL Server table read only. There are several different options for doing this and in this tip we cover various ways that you can make a table read only in a SQL Server database.
There may be requirements where we have to make specific tables read only. You can make a specific table in database read only by using one of the below techniques. For these examples, we will use database MyDB and table tblEvents for all of the examples.
To setup the examples, execute the below script to create the sample database and table.
create database MyDB create table tblEvents ( id int, logEvent varchar(1000) ) insert into tblEvents values (1, 'Password Changed'), (2, 'User Dropped'), (3, 'Finance Data Changed')
Please note that I have used an INSTEAD OF trigger. If you use an AFTER trigger it will actually execute the DELETE, UPDATE or INSERT statement which will require locking, writes to transaction log and a rollback which could impact performance.
CREATE TRIGGER trReadOnly_tblEvents ON tblEvents
INSTEAD OF INSERT,
UPDATE,
DELETE
AS
BEGIN
RAISERROR( 'tblEvents table is read only.', 16, 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
END
Whenever a user executes an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statement, the transaction will fail with the below error.
Msg 50000, Level 16, State 1, Procedure trReadOnly_tblEvents, Line 7 tblEvents table is read only. Msg 3609, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The transaction ended in the trigger. The batch has been aborted.
Here we will add a check constraint on the table with the expression 1=0, which will always be false. It will not allow you to do an INSERT or UPDATE on any rows.
Here we will first disable the trigger created in the previous step using the below script.
disable trigger trReadOnly_tblEvents on tblevents
Add the Check Constraint using the below script.
ALTER TABLE tblEvents WITH NOCHECK ADD CONSTRAINT chk_read_only_tblEvent CHECK( 1 = 0 )
Whenever you execute an INSERT/UPDATE query, it will fail with the below error.
But the check constraint will not prevent a DELETE operation. To stop the DELETE, you will also need to create a DDL trigger as shown below.
CREATE TRIGGER trReadOnlyDel_tblEvents ON tblEvents
INSTEAD OF
DELETE
AS
BEGIN
RAISERROR( 'tblEvents table is read only.', 16, 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
END
You can make the database read only and it will not allow any DDL/DML operations for the entire database. Execute the below query to make the database read only.
USE [master] GO ALTER DATABASE [MyDB] SET READ_ONLY WITH NO_WAIT GO
Here we will create the table in a separate filegroup and make the filegroup read only.
Any DML operation against the table will fail with the below error.
You can control user permissions by using DCL commands, however it will not prevent users with elevated permissions (for example System Admin, Database Owner).
DENY INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON tblEvents TO Jugal DENY INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON tblEvents TO Public
Instead of giving access to the table, you can use a view. The view below would prevent any DML operations on it.
create view vwtblEvents as select ID, Logevent from tblEvents union all select 0, '0' where 1=0
For this view I have added a UNION. If you use this approach you will need to make sure there are a matching number of columns that are output for each of the queries. In this example there are two columns, so I have two output columns for both queries. Also, you need to make sure the data types match as well.
When a user tries to perform an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE operation they will get the below errors.
Msg 4406, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Update or insert of view or function 'vwtblEvents1' failed because it contains a derived or constant field. Msg 4426, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 View 'vwtblEvents1' is not updatable because the definition contains a UNION operator.
| Friday, June 15, 2012 - 8:00:10 AM - dharma | Read The Tip |
|
This article is really good and helped me to understnd more about SQL server.
Thanks for the nice article. |
|
| Friday, June 15, 2012 - 9:10:18 AM - Armando Prato | Read The Tip |
|
Great tricks... I wish there were a command like ALTER TABLE....READONLY that could be applied so we didn't have to jump |
|
| Friday, June 15, 2012 - 10:09:03 AM - prasad | Read The Tip |
|
Very nice article Jugal.. keep posting like this.. I appreciate you .... |
|
| Friday, June 15, 2012 - 10:17:38 AM - Jugal | Read The Tip |
|
thank you all for your comments |
|
| Friday, June 15, 2012 - 12:34:58 PM - Ameena | Read The Tip |
|
Thanks for putting all the options in one place. This is a thoughtful article. If I have to choose from these options, I would choose “Create view” as my first choice and “putting table in a readonly filegroup” as my second choice. I will explain the reasoning behind my choices. Creating and maintaining trigger is complex management work for this simple task. For example if you restore this database to some other place where you do not have read only restriction to that table then you have to remember to remove or disable the trigger and\or constraint. Putting Database in a read only mode is an over kill in my opinion in production because usually you have many tables versus single table in a database. Lastly Deny object level permission is not Microsoft recommended best practice. Having said it all, I understand that in some special scenario any one of them will be more suitable than the other. So “it depends” why you want a read only table and who will be using it and how it will be used. |
|
| Monday, June 18, 2012 - 1:47:05 AM - Prasad | Read The Tip |
|
Good post!! Jugal, waiting to see more tips from u.. |
|
| Monday, June 18, 2012 - 5:37:21 AM - Swetha | Read The Tip |
|
Nice article. Thank you! |
|
| Monday, June 18, 2012 - 8:00:14 PM - TimothyAWiseman | Read The Tip |
|
An excellent article, thank you for posting it. Generally, I find permissions the most elegant way to prevent writing to a specific table. It involves the least code stored in the server and is generally a clean solution. As you pointed out, this will not stop a sysadmin or dbo from writing to the table. (As pointed out on MSDN, permission checks are entirely skipped for the sysadmin or dbo of the target database.) However, someone with a sysadmin or dbo access could easily temporarily suspend any other measures involved as well so that is generally not much of a concern. |
|
| Saturday, June 23, 2012 - 10:01:37 AM - tharg | Read The Tip |
|
Very clearly explained with the right amount of detail. Thanks Jugal! |
|
| Wednesday, September 26, 2012 - 4:55:09 AM - Senthilnathan | Read The Tip |
|
How to make a column in a table as Write protected in SQL Server |
|
| Wednesday, September 26, 2012 - 9:02:53 AM - Jugal | Read The Tip |
|
You can either use the check constraint on the column or don't include that column in any INSERT statement. |
|
| Sunday, January 27, 2013 - 9:29:10 AM - JALINDAR | Read The Tip |
|
Single Query for DATABASE & TABLES I have 1 Database & Its Table allready E.g Database -> ABC101 AND TABLE CARS. , Now I Want to Create New DATABASE E.g. ABC102 & its table Cars & CarsModel in single Qurey ? Please give me Solution with Query example.
|
|
|
privacy | disclaimer | copyright | advertise | about authors | contribute | feedback | giveaways | user groups Some names and products listed are the registered trademarks of their respective owners. Edgewood Solutions LLC | MSSharePointTips.com | MSSQLTips.com |