Comparing SQL Server CPU usage with arithmetic for float versus numeric datatypes
By: Ben Snaidero | Updated: 2018-12-11 | Comments | Related: More > Database Design
A lot of my time as a SQL Server DBA is focused on performance. One of the things I enjoy most about database performance is squeezing the best possible performance out of every query that hits the database. Sometimes performance gains can come not only from having the correct indexes on a tables column(s), but also using the right datatypes. In this tip we will show how arithmetic operations on the float datatype will use less CPU than its numeric counterpart.
For those who don't understand the difference between the real/float and the numeric/decimal datatypes at a high level the former are approximate-number datatypes which means that not all numbers can be represented exactly and are instead stored with the closest possible approximation. The latter are exact-number datatypes and the values stored here are represented with exact precision. That said, if your application requires exact precision then the following test really won't benefit you, but if your application does not require this then the testing below will show you how using approximate datatypes could give you some performance benefit.
For the following test we are going to setup two tables. One table will contain two float datatype columns and the other table will contain two numeric datatype columns. The TSQL to create and load matching (with the exception that the float data is approximate) random data into the tables is as follows.
create table testnumeric ( num1 numeric(19,8), num2 numeric(19,8)) go create table testfloat ( f1 float, f2 float) go declare @random1 numeric(19,8) declare @random2 numeric(19,8) declare @x integer select @x=1 while @x < 500000 begin select @random1 = rand() * 100000.0 + 1.0, @random2 = rand() * 100000.0 + 1.0; insert into testnumeric values (@random1,@random2); insert into testfloat values(cast(@random1 as float),cast(@random2 as float)); select @x = @x + 1; end go
Note: The numeric type was chosen with the precision and scale above to keep the space used by each column as close as possible so the test would not be affected by any differences in column size. Using sp_spaceused below you can see they are quite close.
sp_spaceused 'testnumeric' go sp_spaceused 'testfloat' go
|testnumeric||499999||14088 KB||14040 KB||8 KB||40 KB|
|testfloat||499999||13000 KB||12992 KB||8 KB||0 KB|
In order to measure the CPU used by each query we will the SQL Server SET statement to enable the output of the query timing. Once we enable the STATISTICS TIME option using the following statement, after each query completes, we will see the CPU and total elapsed time for the parse, compile and execution phases of each query.
set statistics time on
In order to test this we will perform 4 basic math operations (+,-,*,/) on the pair of columns for every row in each table. The TSQL for these two queries is as follows.
select num1+num2,num1-num2,num1*num2,num1/num2 from testnumeric; go select f1+f2,f1-f2,f1*f2,f1/f2 from testfloat; go
Looking at the results from the statistics we enabled we can see that not only did the operations on the float columns use considerably less CPU (~37%) it also completed faster.
|Name||CPU (ms)||Duration (ms)|
This first test showed us that, overall, arithmetic on a float column type uses less CPU than arithmetic on a numeric column type. Now let’s see if we can narrow it down to just one operation that causes the extra CPU to be used when dealing with numeric columns or if every operation uses less CPU. To test this we will just run each item in the select list above as its own query. The TSQL for these statements are below.
select num1+num2 from testnumeric go select f1+f2 from testfloat go select num1-num2 from testnumeric; -- CPU 328ms TOTAL 4454ms go select f1-f2 from testfloat; -- CPU 203ms TOTAL 3713ms go select num1*num2 from testnumeric; -- CPU 344ms TOTAL 4009ms go select f1*f2 from testfloat; -- CPU 219ms TOTAL 3808ms go select num1/num2 from testnumeric; -- CPU 547ms TOTAL 4186ms go select f1/f2 from testfloat; -- CPU 296ms TOTAL 4077ms go
The test results below confirm that every operation against the float datatype uses less CPU than its numeric counterpart, anywhere from 35-45% less.
|Name||Operation||CPU (ms)||Duration (ms)|
This simple test has shown that if your application requirements dictate that you do not need the accuracy of the numeric datatype then switching your columns to the float datatype could result in considerably less resource usage when performing arithmetic on these datatypes in your SQL Server environment. As always you should test with your own application and data to confirm you see an improvement before making any permanent changes in your production environment.
- Read other tips comparing datatypes
- Read other tips on performance tuning
Last Updated: 2018-12-11
About the author
View all my tips